Home Real Estate Strategy Tourism Development National Vision Strategy Special Projects Digital Transformation Experience Reports Insights About Us Services Contact
Englishالعربية中文日本語EspañolFrançaisItalianoPortuguêsΕλληνικάDeutschSuomiDanskRomânăKiswahiliРусскийКыргызчаҚазақшаTürkçe

Heirstone Consulting Research · October 2026

Surplus State Property: The second price

Releasing surplus state land and buildings without giving the value away: evidence from 27 named releases and five national estates, with lessons for Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Morocco.

28 pages · PDF · English · Free
Cover of the Heirstone Consulting Research report Surplus State Property: The second price

The report in six numbers

0.18%

of estate value realised from sales in a year by both the UK central estate (2024-25) and the Dutch State property agency (2023). Heirstone analysis

5 days

of UK estate running costs covered by a full year of disposal proceeds: £367m against £26.6bn (2024-25)

5.5x

the price per home the UK Ministry of Defence paid in 2024 to buy back family homes it sold and leased back in 1996

18

tenders for Hong Kong's Murray Building, offered on a 50-year grant that allowed hotel use only and barred demolition (2013)

MAD 55bn

mobilised by Morocco through innovative financing from 2019 to mid-2024, much of it by selling public buildings and leasing them back

40,000

government employees moved to Egypt's New Administrative Capital by July 2023, leaving central Cairo ministry buildings for release

In brief

A sale price records one day. What the state pays in the years after a release decides whether the value was kept.

We call that later cost the second price: rent on space the state sold but still needs, the running cost of buildings left empty, years without use while a site waits for a partner or a permission, and gains handed to the next owner. In the 27 releases we traced, the largest losses came from these later costs, and each of them can be estimated before the route is chosen.

  1. Most state estates barely turn over.

    The UK and Dutch central estates each realised about 0.18% of their value from sales in a year. In 2024-25 a year of UK disposal proceeds paid for about five days of running costs.

  2. The heaviest losses followed sales of space the state kept using.

    The UK Ministry of Defence sold about 55,000 homes in 1996, paid £230m a year to rent them back by 2024, then repurchased 36,347 of them at 5.5 times the 1996 price per home. France sold the Imprimerie nationale for €85m and bought it back four years later for €376.5m.

  3. Time to reopening is a discount that rarely appears in the accounts.

    In our register of 27 releases, buildings took three to sixteen years to reopen once released. Three of the four fastest had the use or the investment fixed at release.

  4. Conditions written into the title held value.

    Hong Kong's Murray Building drew 18 tenders and HK$4.4bn for a 50-year grant limited to hotel use, with demolition barred.

  5. The vehicles that captured land value were built to wait.

    Hamburg paid for about half of HafenCity's €3bn of public works from land sales; Copenhagen's By & Havn expects to repay its debt towards 2070.

  6. The region uses five routes at once.

    Egypt vests ministry buildings in its sovereign fund and sold the rights to Ras El Hekma for US$24bn while keeping a 35% stake. Morocco sells public buildings to institutional funds and leases them back, Saudi Arabia reallocates inside government first, and Dubai has floated part of a state-owned REIT.

What it means

Recommendations by audience

Land agencies

Publish a valued register and report holding cost next to receipts every year.

Sovereign funds and master developers

Write use, conservation and a revenue share into the grant, then tender it openly.

Investors and lenders

Underwrite the occupier's exit date and the planning path as closely as the price.

Inside the full report

28 pages of evidence, benchmarks and tests

  1. Holding is the default
  2. Sold, then rented back
  3. The release clock
  4. Terms that travel with the title
  5. Vehicles built to wait
  6. The Heirstone Second Price Test
  7. Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Morocco

Heirstone datasets

27

named releases in the Heirstone Release Register, from Whitehall to Tahrir Square

5

lines of the second price in the Heirstone Second Price Test: rent-back, holding, delivery, upside and proceeds

Built from public sources current at October 2026. Every figure is referenced in the report, and figures we derive by combining published numbers are labelled Heirstone analysis.

Frequently asked questions

What is the 'second price' of releasing state property?

It is the cost the state carries after a release: rent on space it sold but still needs, running costs of empty buildings, years without use while a site waits, and gains handed to the next owner. In the 27 releases Heirstone traced, these later costs caused the largest losses.

Does a sale-and-leaseback of government buildings create value?

Only if the state will not need the space for long. At the 6.3 to 7% returns reported on Moroccan State leasebacks, rent repays the sale price in 14 to 16 years; the UK Ministry of Defence ended up repurchasing homes at 5.5 times their 1996 price per home.

How can governments keep value when releasing surplus land?

By fixing the use and conditions in the title before tendering, choosing the release route with its holding and rent-back costs estimated in advance, and using vehicles patient enough to capture land value over decades.

Real Estate Strategy

How we can help

Explore the practice

Heirstone Consulting Research

More reports

All reports

Discuss Your Mandate

Speak directly with a senior partner about your project, asset or programme.

Get in Touch

Heirstone Consulting Research

Get the full report

Enter your details and we will email you a personal download link. Please use an address you can open: the report is sent only to that inbox.